Quote and cite checker No AI in this tool

Does the transcript say exactly this, here, and did the witness say it?

The checker answers that one question for every quotation in a brief. It compares word by word against the transcript as code read it. It runs on your computer and uses no model.

The two demo files, to run through the program yourself: deposition.txt and brief.docx.

The preview program is named Transcript Check (version 0.4.0, built 4 Nov 2026). It contains the quote and cite checker. The summary is switched off in this build, and the chronology screen is not in it. Results on this site dated after 4 Nov were measured on later code.

From the brief ¶ 5

The plaintiff testified to the speed before the light: I was going maybe five miles an hour. Mockridge Dep. 2:13.

deposition.txtTranscript around the quote
  1. 2:12Q. How fast were you going just before the light?
  2. 2:13A. I think I was going maybe five miles an hour.
  3. 2:14Q. So you were still moving when you were hit?
  4. 2:15A. No. I had come to a full stop by then.

Problem found Differs Changes what was said

Every word that remains is in the transcript. The witness was less sure than the quotation makes it sound.

What is checked

Three questions, asked of every quotation.

Are these the exact words?

The quotation is laid against the witness's whole answer. Added, dropped and changed words are marked. A dropped qualifier such as not, I think or I don't recall is called out by name.

Is this the right page and line?

The cite is compared with where the words sit in the file. If the words are somewhere else, the checker gives the page and line where it found them.

Did the witness say it?

Questions, objections, colloquy and anything an attorney or the reporter said are never the witness's testimony. Exact words from the wrong mouth are never shown as clean.

The verdicts

What green, amber and red promise.

Green means one thing only. Earlier test rounds kept finding word-perfect quotations whose meaning changed because of what they left out, so every partial quotation is now amber, with the rest of the answer on screen.

The screen saysColourWhat it meansExample
ExactGreen
Verified
The witness's whole answer, word for word, with the right cite.Demo brief ¶ 4: the stopped-at-the-light answer at 2:10-11, quoted across a line break.
Part of an answer (read the rest)Amber
Read before you rely on it
The words, marks and cite are right, but the quotation is only part of what the witness answered. The rest of the answer is shown.A quotation that keeps the second sentence of an answer and leaves out the first.
Whole answer, but read onAmberThe whole answer, but something soon after takes it back or corrects it.The witness says I misspoke a few lines later.
Altered (read the notes)AmberEvery word matches, but brackets change words. Each bracket is shown beside what it replaces.[my] in place of their.
Wrong citeAmberThe words are in the transcript, but not where the cite says. The right page and line are given.Demo brief ¶ 6: cited to 4:23, found at 3:23.
Exact words, not cleanAmberThe words match, but the witness did not say them.Demo brief ¶ 7: Were you looking at your phone? is counsel's question at 2:16.
Not a quote: compare with the recordAmberThe passage reads as a paraphrase. Compare it with the record.A sentence typed without quotation marks that restates the testimony.
DiffersRed or amberThe closest passage, with added, dropped and changed words marked. Red when the change removes or adds a hedge, a denial or another qualifier. Amber when the words differ in another way, such as a changed number or name, or only capitals and punctuation.Demo brief ¶ 5: I think left out of the answer at 2:13.
Not foundRed
Problem found
Nothing in the transcript is close enough.Demo brief ¶ 8: I have not been able to work at all since the crash.

What a green quotation may ignore

Only differences that cannot change meaning: spacing, curly or straight quotation marks and dashes, a word hyphenated across a line break, a bracketed capital such as [t]he, and an editorial note such as [sic]. Ellipses and brackets are read as what they are.

When the checker is unsure

It does not round up. An uncertain match is reported as different or not found, with the closest testimony beside it so you can read it yourself.

Step by step

From a transcript file to a report you can hand to a partner.

  1. Open the transcript

    Code reads every page and finds the printed page and line numbers. It lists the pages it leaves out and why. You confirm how the pages read before anything is checked.

  2. Paste a quotation, or drop the brief

    One quotation and its cite, or a whole .docx. The brief is read in memory and is not written to disk.

  3. Every quotation is found and paired with its cite

    Body text, tables, footnotes and endnotes are read. A quotation in a parenthetical belongs to the cite before it. Id. takes the cite before it. A cite that names a witness is checked only against that witness's transcript.

  4. Each one is compared with the whole answer

    Word by word, against the answer it comes from, and against who was speaking.

  5. You read the verdict with the testimony beside it

    Every result shows the lines around the quotation. The quoted lines are highlighted and the rest of the answer is shaded.

  6. Export the report

    Word or PDF. It lists each quotation, its verdict and the testimony it was checked against. Anything that was not checked, such as case law or an exhibit, is listed with the reason, so the counts add up.

Check a brief
The desktop program after checking the demo brief: five quotations checked, one verified, two to read before relying on them and two with a problem found, each with its cite and result.Open full size
The whole demo brief, checked. One of five quotations is verified. The program's working name is Transcript Check, and the captures on this site are from code later than the preview build.
Check a quote
The desktop program showing Problem found for a quotation that leaves out I think, with the testimony at 2:13 highlighted.Open full size
One quotation, with the testimony it was checked against. Invented demo deposition.

Transcript layouts

What it reads, and what it says when it cannot.

Transcripts arrive in many shapes. The reader handles these, and names every page it leaves out.

Full-size PDF

One transcript page to a sheet, with a text layer. Court filing stamps are told apart from the printed page number.

Condensed, four to a sheet

Read through a working copy with one page per sheet. The copy is checked against the original before it is used.

Plain .txt

A reporter's text file with numbered lines and page breaks, read into a checked page copy. The demo deposition is one of these.

Line numbers only in the image

When the numbers were scanned and are not in the text, they are read by OCR on your computer and checked.

Pages it leaves out are listed

Caption pages, the reporter's certificate, errata and index sheets are not testimony. They are read, listed as left out with the reason, and never quietly dropped. In the demo deposition, pages 2 to 4 are testimony and the caption page and certificate are listed.

Read and cite
The desktop program showing page 2 of the invented demo deposition, every line numbered and labelled.Open full size
Click a line to copy its cite. Invented demo deposition.

What it refuses to do

Four things it will not do, by design.

Guess a page number

When a page cannot be read with certainty, it is left out and listed. The checker does not make up a cite.

Call a partial quotation clean

Correct words cut from a longer answer are amber, with the rest of the answer shown.

I think I was going maybe five miles an hour.

Count counsel's words as testimony

A question quoted as if the witness said it is flagged, even when every word matches.

Q. Were you looking at your phone?

Send your files anywhere

The check runs on your computer and uses no model. The status bar says so: checked on this computer, no AI.

Measured, in our own tests

Results from the final test round.

A fresh set of public court-filed transcripts the tool had not seen, with defects planted in quotations and briefs. These are our own tests, not customer results.

Altered quotations shown green
0 of 63
2 Nov 2026. 1
Errors planted in briefs that were caught
28 of 29
One was missed. 2 Nov 2026. 1
Planned verdicts given on the demo brief
5 of 5
The five quotations you can try in the demo. 10 Nov 2026. 5

Limits

What the quote checker cannot do yet.

  • It missed one planted error. In the final round, 28 of 29 errors planted in briefs were caught. A report from this tool is a check, not a guarantee.
  • Loading is the weakest part. In that round only 2 of 7 new transcripts loaded with no help. On 10 Nov 2026 we read the same seven again: 3 load on their own, 3 condensed ones are read through the one-page-per-sheet copy, and 1 needs the line-number copy.
  • Condensed transcripts are slow. Building the checked working copy took 5 to 10 minutes on some files in the final round.
  • Amber is common. A correct quotation that is only part of an answer is amber by design. You will read more context than a search tool would show you.
  • It checks deposition quotations only. Case law, exhibits and quotations with no deposition cite are listed as not checked. It does not judge whether the argument is sound.
  • Quotation marks change the label. Typed without quotation marks, words that are not in the transcript are labelled Not a quote (amber). In quotation marks, or in a brief, the same words are Not found (red).
  • The Windows build is an unsigned preview. Windows SmartScreen warns before it runs.

Try the five quotations from the demo brief.

The real checker runs in your browser on the invented deposition. Change a word and check again.