The working demo
Try it on an invented deposition.
One invented plaintiff: a five-page deposition, a brief that misquotes it, and 28 pages of records.
The demo's data could not be loaded. Reload the page to try again.
Check a quotation
Prepared examples
Showing recorded results. The real checker starts in your browser when you check a quotation.
deposition.txt as the reader read it Download the file
Pages 2 to 4 are testimony. Page and line numbers come from the reader, not from this page.
Check the brief
The demo brief quotes the deposition five times. One quotation is right; four carry an error planted on purpose. This is the product's own report on that Word file, recorded when this site was built.
The two files the checker read: brief.docx and deposition.txt.
Review the summary
Saved result of one model run on 2026-11-10, replayed; no model runs when you visit.
A model proposed these twelve points from the witness's answers. It never saw a page or line number: code attached each citation, and a person decides every point. Read each one against its testimony, then keep it or leave it out.
This run kept 12 points. It left out testimony a reader would want, for example the answer at 3:19 about earlier neck treatment, and one kept point (“They come maybe once a week now”) does not say what “they” are. A MoonView summary is supported, not complete: read it with the transcript. Points say “the witness” because the model is given the answers without the witness’s name and is told to keep the answer’s own words, putting “the witness” where the answer says “I” or “my”.
Every point in this run carries at least one caution; that is normal for a short deposition.
What the wording check refuses
The saved run kept no record of model output that code turned away, so none is shown here. These four rewordings were planted for the demo and put to the product's wording check, the one that holds a model's point and a reviewer's edit to the same rule. Each refusal is the check's own words.
The twelve quotations code rebuilt from the transcript
A quotation in a MoonView summary is never typed by a model. Code rebuilds it from the transcript's own words and attaches the cite.
Review the chronology
Entries from the record generator's answer key, not from a model. Verdicts from the product's own entry check. Tested on synthetic records only.
The 28 record pages were Bates-stamped and read with local OCR by the product's intake. Each entry below was then checked against the text of the pages it cites. Pick a cite to see the page.
These synthetic records test reading and matching; they are not clinically coherent (an entry can pair a lumbar finding with a cervical diagnosis).
Entries, each checked against its pages
Planted slips, put to the same check
True entries with one thing changed on purpose, as a model or a tired person might get it wrong. The check is not told what was changed.